Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS

Preparing for TEAM: Transforming Episode Accountability Model

Overview

Medicare’s new mandatory bundled payment model, the Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM), begins in 2026. Under TEAM, approximately 741 acute care hospitals in 188 markets will be required to assume financial risk for five surgical episodes from admission to 30 days post-discharge. These covered episodes include: Major joint replacement of the lower extremity (LEJR), surgical hip and femur fracture treatment (SHFFT), spinal fusion, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and major bowel procedure.

Hospital target prices are based on average risk-adjusted spending per episode in each of the nine US census regions during the three-year baseline period, with an adjustment for quality. Analyses show two-thirds of hospitals will lose an average of $1,350 in revenue per case based on current spending.1 Succeeding in bundled payment requires actively managing the continuum of care.

The Surgeon’s Role

Surgeons have an important role to play in improving efficiency and quality.

Improving processes: TEAM hospitals will need to invest in clinical redesign for internal efficiencies, including coordination for greater pre-surgical care (e.g., physical therapy, primary care coordination) to prepare patients for a successful procedure and recovery.

Collaborating for post-acute care: Improving transitions for post-surgical care management, with partner providers and accountable care organizations, will also be needed.

Monitoring outcomes: TEAM will be a MIPS APM2 for all participation tracks, and the model allows for gainsharing opportunities with clinicians.

How to prepare for TEAM

If you determine that you will be caring for surgical patients at one of the mandatory TEAM participating sites there are several things that you can do now to be prepared in 2026.

  • Learn the model. In addition to this document and other ACS materials, the Institute for Accountable Care (IAC) has summary resources3 with more details on how the model works.
  • Learn about surgeries within your hospital/system, including both quality and efficiency metrics.
    • IAC has developed opportunity analysis reports that summarize episode cost and utilization data across many levels, including by region, market, hospital, care setting, DRG, and surgeon. Contact IAC at analytics@institute4ac.org for a complimentary briefing with policy experts.
    • Familiarize yourself with ACS quality programs that your hospital may already have in place.
  • Begin developing clinical redesign strategies with care teams that manage surgical episodes across the care continuum, including primary and post-acute care. This redesign will serve not only as a means of improving performance on current TEAM episodes, but also as a strong foundation for potential expansion of this model or future payment models from CMS or other payers that could include additional episodes and DRGs.

How TEAM Could Impact Revenues

Initial analysis from the IAC indicates that the way TEAM target prices are structured will likely result in significant revenue loss for some hospitals if they fail to take appropriate action to prepare. While the majority of cases will fall below the target price, the average overage of cases that exceed the target will outweigh these savings for up to two-thirds of hospitals.

Figure 1. Average Revenue Impact per Episode In TEAM Hospitals - 2023

This map displays all TEAM hospitals selected for the model, with their average revenue impact per qualifying episode (gain = green or loss = red/orange), based on 2023 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) data. Bubble size corresponds with 2023 case count. Hospitals in gray (N/A) have fewer than one hundred qualifying cases in 2023.

Table 1. National Summary – Revenue Impact of TEAM by Surgical Episode (2023)

Financial Impact of TEAM (2023)

Gain

Loss

TEAM Surgical Episode

Total Cases

# cases

Avg gain/case

#cases

Avg. loss/case

Lower Joint Replacement (LEJR)

118,155

74,626

$2,637

43,529

($6,133)

Spinal Fusion

30,689

18,317

$7,833

12,372

($14,188)

Hip & Femur Procedures (SHFFT)

25,427

13,281

$7,970

12,146

($10,046)

Major Bowel Procedure

19,723

13,282

$6,092

6,441

($13,726)

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)

10,020

6,580

$6,927

3,440

($15,142)

Total

204,014

126,086

77,928

Table 1 looks at individual FFS cases from hospitals selected for TEAM using Medicare data from 2023. Here we see case count by TEAM episode category and a breakdown in case count and average financial impact by revenue “winners” and “losers.” As shown in the table, there are more winners than losers, but the losers lose more on average. In other words, this model promotes large volumes of small wins paid for by a small volume of large losses. Note that these calculations include the CMS discount rates, but not the stop gain(loss) caps, since this is not at the hospital level.

Figure 2. Financial Impact of TEAM for Hospitals with 300+ Qualifying Cases:
Average 2023 Revenue Gain or Loss per Episode

Figure 2 looks at the financial impact at the hospital level - of the selected hospitals with at least 300 qualifying Medicare FFS cases in 2023, one-third would earn revenue while two-thirds would lose revenue under the TEAM model, given current spending. This graph shows the distribution of the average financial impact per case, with some hospitals earning as much as $3,000 and others losing
over $5,500 in revenue per qualifying episode.4

Table 2. Twenty Largest Markets Selected for TEAM

Metro Area

State

Hospitals

Cases

New York

NY

97

40,669

Boston

MA

34

17,139

Washington

DC

22

9,083

San Francisco

CA

28

7,755

Nashville

TN

16

7,523

Minneapolis

MN

21

5,955

Jacksonville

FL

12

5,761

Denver

CO

20

5,712

San Diego

CA

14

5,216

Tulsa

OK

12

3,735

Riverside

CA

23

3,698

Providence

RI

13

3,520

Raleigh

NC

5

3,356

Portland

OR

17

3,279

Tucson

AZ

8

2,950

Greenville

SC

6

2,887

Memphis

TN

6

2,863

San Jose

CA

6

2,816

Huntsville

AL

3

2,562

Harrisburg

PA

5

2,129

Total

368

138,608

Table 2 summarizes the largest markets selected for TEAM participation, based on the volume of qualifying Medicare FFS cases in 2023 (i.e., all 5 episode categories in the model). These twenty markets account for over two-thirds of 2023 cases across the 188 TEAM regions. The full list of selected facilities can be accessed on the CMS TEAM website5.

References

  1. Based on Institute for Accountable Care analysis of 2021-2023 Traditional Medicare claims data. Target prices calculated with 2021 – 2023 Medicare claims data by census division and trended, wage adjusted, and risk adjusted for all qualifying US hospitals with at least 11 TEAM episodes in 2023 using specifications from the final 2025 iPPS rule.
  2. Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Alternative Payment Model (APM).
  3. https://www.institute4ac.org/team-resources/
  4. These calculations also account for stop gain(loss) caps, assuming safety net/rural hospitals will be in Track 2, all others in Track 3.
  5. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/team-model