Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Membership Benefits
ACS
RISE

References

  1. 2017 Main Residency Match Results and Data. National Resident Matching Program. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2017.pdf. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  2. Apply smart in general surgery: New data to consider. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/cim/480042/applysmartgs.html. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  3. Historical Specialty Specific Data on ERAS Applicants and Applications. https://www.aamc.org/services/eras/stats/359278/stats.html. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  4. Results of the 2017 NRMP Applicant Survey. National Resident Matching Program. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Applicant-Survey-Report-2017.pdf. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  5. Cost of Applying to Residency Questionnaire Report. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/download/430902/data/costofapplyingtoresidency.pdf. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  6. Gardner AK, Smink DS, Scott BG, Korndorffer JR, Harrington DT, Ritter EM. How much are we spending on resident selection? Podium presentation at the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) Annual Meeting. Austin, Texas. May 4, 2018.
  7. Yeo H, Abelson J, Mao J, Lewis F, Michelassi F, Bell RH, Sedrakyan A, Sosa J. Who makes it to the end? A novel predictive model for identifying surgical residents at risk of dropping out. Annals Surg 2017; 266: 499-507.
  8. Schwed AC, Lee SL, Salcedo ES, Reeves ME, Inaba K, et al. Association of general surgery resident remediation and program director attitudes with resident attrition. JAMA Surgery 2017; 152: 1134-1140.
  9. Bergen PC, Littlefield JH, O’Keefe, GE et al. Identification of high-risk residents. J Surg Res 2000; 92: 239-244.
  10. Yaghoubian A, Galante J, Kaji A, et al. General surgery resident remediation and attrition. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 829-833.
  11. Gardner AK, Ritter EM, Paige JT, Ahmed RA, Fernandez G, Dunkin BJ. Simulation-based selection of medical trainees: Considerations, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Coll Surgeons 2016; 223: 530-536.
  12. Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Evaluation of validity evidence for personality, emotional intelligence, and situational judgment tests to identify successful residents. JAMA Surg 2017; DOI: 10.1001;jamasurg.2017.5013.
  13. Gardner AK, Grantcharov T, Dunkin BJ. The science of selection: Using best practices from industry to improve success in surgery training. J Surg Educ 2017; DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.010.
  14. Makdisi G, Takeuchi T, Rodriguez J, Rucinski J, Wise L. How we select our residents – a s survey of selection criteria in general surgery residents. J Surg Educ 2011; 68: 67-72.
  15. Stephenson-Famy A, Houmard BS, Oberoi S, Manyak A, Chiang S, Kim S. Use of the interview in resident candidate selection: A review of the literature. J Grad Med Educ 2015; 7: 539-548.
  16. Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Leveling the playing field: The power of selection science to enhance diversity, increase efficiency, and provide meaningful data for selecting surgical trainees. Ann Surg (revise and resubmit).
  17. Gardner AK, Dunkin BJ. Applicant perceptions of new selection systems for surgical training: Selection science doesn’t “scare away the good ones.” Podium presentation at the Association for Surgical Education (ASE) annual meeting. Austin, Texas, May 1, 2018.
  18. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
  19. Outtz JL. The role of cognitive ability tests in employment selection. Human Performance. 2002;15:161–71.
  20. De Virgilio C, Yaghoubian A, Kaji A, Collins JC, Deveney K, et al. Predicting performance on the American Board of Surgery qualifying and certifying examinations. A multi-institutional study. JAMA Surgery 2010; 145: 852-856.
  21. Trix F, Psenka C. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse & Society, 2003.
  22. Madera JM, Hebl MR, Martin RC. Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. J Appl Psychol 2009.
  23. Schmader T, Whitehead J, Wysocki VH. A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles 2007; 57: 509-514.
  24. Wright SR, Bradley PM. Has the UK Clinical Aptitude Test improved medical student selection? Med Educ 2010; 1069-1076.
  25. Results of the 2016 NRMP Program Director Survey. National Resident Matching Program. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NRMP-2016-Program-Director-Survey.pdf. Accessed on February 5, 2018.
  26. Gardner AK, D’Onofrio BC, Dunkin BJ. Can we get faculty interviewers on the same page? An examination of a structured interview course for surgeons. J Surg Educ 2017; S1931-7204.
  27. Hern HG, Trivedi T, Alter HJ, Wills CP. How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews? A follow-up study of applicants to all specialties in the national resident matching program. Acad Med 2016; 91: 1546-1553.
  28. Kelz RR, Mullen JL, Kaiser LR, Pray LA, Shea GP. Prevention of surgical resident attrition by a novel selection strategy. Annals 2010; 252: 537-543.