Carl Gustaf S. Axelsson, MD, MPhil, MMSc; Michael G. Healy, EdD; Roy Phitayakorn, MD, MHPE
November 1, 2020
For clinician-educators, the COVID-19 worldwide pandemic has introduced both challenges and opportunities in maintaining a productive learning environment. As the world moves towards a "new normal," educators will need to convert high-quality bedside teaching, to equally high quality “webside teaching.”1,2
Telehealth is specifically “the use of electronic information and telecommunications technologies to support and promote long distance clinical health care, patient and professional health-related education, public health and health administration.”3 It is mainly implemented via video conferencing over the internet.3 Furthermore, telehealth can be provided synchronously or asynchronously (e.g., live video chat or email conversation), and delivered by either a solo physician or multidisciplinary team.4 Additional benefits of telehealth include increasing patient and provider satisfaction, cost and time savings, and non-inferiority clinical outcomes for several medical conditions.4 However, it has been noted that the lack of training is one of the principal barriers to the adoption of telehealth.5 As such, the American Medical Association has repeatedly emphasized the importance of telehealth as a core competency for medical students.6
Many principles that underlie good bedside teaching can be adapted for telehealth visits, but the workflow must be clearly modified from a traditional in-person surgical clinic. First, the attending surgeon should be transparent with their residents and medical students about how they offer telehealth visits to their patients and if there are any conditions or issues that the surgeon would prefer to see in-person and not virtually. Next, we recommend that the surgeon clearly divide all patients between the medical student and/or resident well in advance of the actual telehealth clinic and send the information to the appropriate learners. This will give the resident or medical student time to read and prepare for each patient prior to the virtual clinic. To maximize efficiency and minimize technology issues, a patient should probably have either a medical student or resident learner and not both. In terms of the logistics for the individual telehealth visit, we have found that it is ideal if the attending surgeon starts the telehealth visit with the patient and explains that they will first speak with either a medical student or resident and the learner’s role in the encounter. If possible, the attending surgeon should then observe the medical student’s or resident’s interaction. When the learner is done, the surgeon should then clarify any confusing parts of the encounter and summarize next steps with the patient. Feedback or teachable moments should be given to the learners after the patient has ended the encounter. Alternatively, if the surgeon and learner are in the same physical location to each other, they could place the patient on hold and confer privately before the surgeon clarifies and summarizes with the patient. This process would then continue until all the telehealth patients are seen. In the remainder of this article, we outline new roles and actions for medical students, residents, and attending surgeons to maximize the educational value of telehealth visits.
As surgical educators, we aim to help medical students transition from the Reporter level of the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) framework to the Manager level. Table 1 outlines actions and the related rationale that attending surgeons could use to help students transition from Reporter to Manager while employing telehealth visits.7–9
Surgery residents should be able to accomplish all of the medical student actions described in Table 1, but also demonstrate the actions required to manage a busy surgical clinic as outlined in Table 2.
Attending surgeons should be able to effectively teach both medical students and residents, who face some common, and different, opportunities and challenges during a telehealth clinic. While educational principles can hold true in both the virtual and non-virtual environments, some adjustments are needed to facilitate effective clinical care and beneficial education, which are outlined in Table 3.
The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly emphasized the need to maximize the educational value of surgical telehealth visits. While changes in medicine are ubiquitous, we believe the principles outlined above may provide some guidance to combine sound educational principles with the limitations of telehealth visits to ensure they best address the learning needs for the patient, medical student, resident, and attending surgeon. As a final point, while the role of telehealth visits increases, we encourage attending surgeons, residents, and medical students to continuously reflect on the appropriateness of telehealth visits versus in-person visits. Patient selection for a telehealth visit will likely vary between surgeons and clinical practices, but we encourage instructors to be transparent with learners about what factors they consider before offering patients a telehealth appointment. While the benefits of telehealth visits are many, especially amid a pandemic, the loss of the in-person, hands-on experience is likely to have some clinical and educational implications.
Carl Gustaf S. Axelsson, MD, MPhil, MMSc, is a post-doctoral medical education researcher at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA.
Michael G. Healy, EdD, is a research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA.
Roy Phitayakorn, MD, MHPE, is a general and endocrine surgeon and director of medical student education and surgery education research at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA and associate professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA.